Re: ��ӵL�u�q�ܺ��̦n?

Article View: 1.a

Article #14292

#14292

From: CHAN KAM WAH
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 1999 00:00

33 lines
3037 bytes

�p�� wrote:
> 
> I've used one2free and smartone gsm. 1010 network is overall better. If
> 1010's score  is 100, smartone is around 70. But I am now using smartone. �]
> one2free���o�n��! �\�o ���ɷ|��U�q�ܧA, �pݯ�A����\�|���A�ⴣ, �ܦP�A���U
> ���s, ��q�ܶO��charge ��A! �u�Y�nGIN! (�ڭ�|�����\�ҿפU�Ӥ�|compensate
> ��Y�z�����J���k, �ڷ�ɬJplan �Y�C�����p��)
> 
> John K T NG �����e��:
> 
> > I agree with you, I am using Hutchsion, I'll change.
> >
> > Cali wrote:
> >
> > > Me and my family used 1010 & One2free for about 5 years. The network is
> > > very good. Seldom being disconnected, and the voice is clear. If you
> > > want better service and willing to pay more, 1010 is better. As 1010
> > > customer service is excellent, One2free is poorer. I used Hutchsion
> > > before, and encountered rude and impolite customer service
> > > representative.
> > >
> > > Joli Hui wrote:
> > >
> > > > �ڬO�� wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > ????????????, ??????????!
> > > > �`����n�� �MO �P �ƽX�q,  �ӭӥx���o!!!
> > > >
> > > > �M�O �B�B�����, �ƽX�q ��������N���L!!!
__________________________________________________________
�`����n�ΩM�O�N�o��(�M�Ocuctomer service ²���L��D�ȫY�H. �@D§�����L)!
�H�e��1010 ���o�X�n, ��Y���O�Q�������ݭ�X�z.
�Ӯa��sunday �����.���o�Ҽ{!

Technical Details

Message-ID: <37095ED2.5521@netvigator.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<01be6876$78b1cb20$b04497d0@default> <36EAA385.45B93A27@UNSpacyAgency.com> <7copne$26i19@pegasus.hkstar.com> <36F5FB84.12A9@netvigator.com> <36F67467.E3A49576@netvigator.com> <36FF0A9B.CA2B6686@netvigator.com> <370449D4.CE23611C@hongkong.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 113e74,ba58d4e9b6180c09
X-Google-Attributes: gid113e74,public
X-Google-Thread: 104660,ba58d4e9b6180c09
X-Google-Attributes: gid104660,public
X-Google-Thread: 106b44,ba58d4e9b6180c09
X-Google-Attributes: gid106b44,public
X-Google-Thread: 104ba3,ba58d4e9b6180c09
X-Google-Attributes: gid104ba3,public
X-Google-Thread: 1149c7,ba58d4e9b6180c09
X-Google-Attributes: gid1149c7,public
X-Google-Thread: 111726,ba58d4e9b6180c09
X-Google-Attributes: gid111726,public
X-Google-Thread: 107201,ba58d4e9b6180c09
X-Google-Attributes: gid107201,public
X-Google-Thread: f9470,ba58d4e9b6180c09
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9470,public
From: CHAN KAM WAH <masha@netvigator.com>
Subject: Re: ��ӵL�u�q�ܺ����̦n?
Date: 1999/04/06
Message-ID: <37095ED2.5521@netvigator.com>
X-Deja-AN: 463074124
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
References: <01be6876$78b1cb20$b04497d0@default> <36EAA385.45B93A27@UNSpacyAgency.com> <7copne$26i19@pegasus.hkstar.com> <36F5FB84.12A9@netvigator.com> <36F67467.E3A49576@netvigator.com> <36FF0A9B.CA2B6686@netvigator.com> <370449D4.CE23611C@hongkong.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Organization: Netvigator
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: 1.a,hk.biz.general,hk.chinese,hk.general,hk.hkstar.com,hk.super.net,ims.general,ims.tech.general

Reply to Parent Message

Article View: 1.a

Re: ��ӵL�u�q�ܺ����̦n?

Re: ��ӵL�u�q�ܺ��̦n?