🚀 go-pugleaf

In <4aaisv$e2n@news.nevada.edu>, snit@nevada.edu (Snit) writes:
>Jerry Shekhel enlightened us with: 
>: Snit (snit@nevada.edu) wrote:
>: :
>: : You are one of several folks who has said or hinted at this.  Yet
>: : nobody has even been able to show how I have been even slightly wrong.
>: : My GS does do many things as well or better than any moderm machine.
>: : There is a lot it obviously can not do, but considering the resources
>: : of todays computers it really is sad that my GS is in many ways
>: : comparable.
>
>: Perhaps the reason nobody argues with you about the GS is that nobody
>: knows anything about it, nobody's interested, and nobody cares.  I am 100%
>: convinced that you're seeing your GS through the same kind of rose-colored
>: glasses as any other platform advocate.
>
>Certainly I am biased toward my GS.  It is an old computer with a poor
>screen and minimal capabilities and I love it.  But the GS does point
>out the way the modern computer market has gone astray.  Modern
>computers have resources so far beyond that of my GS, yet are in many
>ways (some of which I have listed) are equal or inferior to my GS.
>Folks are pointing out that it might not be all modern computers, but
>mostly MS products that use the resources so poorly.  Big surprise.

Could tell us more about the wonderfulness of the GS computer?

Thanks.

>Use GS/OS.


Daniel A. Stephenson
dano@srl01.cacs.usl.edu