🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: a.bsu.programming
Article #87274

Re: Defferences between 3rd and 4th generation language

#87274
From: Donald Fisk
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 00:00
44 lines
2936 bytes

TANG wrote:
> 
> hi ! currently i'm looking for 3rd and 4th genaration language information.
> hope somebody can help me.

This isn't the answer you wanted, but it's an answer
*about* your question, with an attempt at a direct
answer towards the end.

The first time I heard these terms was after the Japanese
fifth generation project was announced.   The five generations
were for hardware and were valves, transistors, ICs, VLSIs,
and massively parallel dataflow architectures.   The last of
these were supposed to run Prolog which didn't map particularly
well onto the hardware.   By definition then, Prolog was *the*
fifth generation language.  The fifth generation project was
a notable failure for a variety of reasons I won't go into
here.

The term 4th generation language is then what etymologists
would call a back-formation, as in the original definition,
the terms were (with the exception of Prolog as a fifth-
generation language) for hardware.

To get back to your question, 4th generation languages
were special purpose languages which allowed routine data
processing tasks, with form-based user interfaces, to be
developed quickly.   They were usually proprietary.

Third generation languages were the general purpose
languages (notable COBOL and perhaps PL/1) which they
were supposed to replace.

> tang

Le Hibou (ma propre opinion)

-- 
"People help themselves to things if they think they will get
away with it, even things they are unlikely to have much use
for and cannot resell, such as traffic cones. In the UK we
call these people 'students'." -- Joe Boswell
Technical Details
Message-ID: <380242E3.18B685CC@inthan.be>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <38021d6e.0@news2.tm.net.my>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 110a07,1eaa4814f3bfec28,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid110a07,public
X-Google-Thread: fe105,1eaa4814f3bfec28,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidfe105,public
X-Google-Thread: fc8d0,1eaa4814f3bfec28,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidfc8d0,public
X-Google-Thread: 108717,1eaa4814f3bfec28,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid108717,public
X-Google-Thread: 10804c,1eaa4814f3bfec28,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10804c,public
X-Google-Thread: 107d8b,1eaa4814f3bfec28,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid107d8b,public
X-Google-Thread: f87f8,1eaa4814f3bfec28,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf87f8,public
X-Google-Thread: ffc1e,1eaa4814f3bfec28,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidffc1e,public
From: Donald Fisk <donald.fisk@inthan.be>
Subject: Re: Defferences between 3rd and 4th generation language
Date: 1999/10/11
Message-ID: <380242E3.18B685CC@inthan.be>
X-Deja-AN: 535633409
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <38021d6e.0@news2.tm.net.my>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: IH_B
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: a.bsu.programming,alt.mud.programming,alt.winsock.programming,comp.programming,comp.programming.threads,fj.os.ms-windows.programming,microsoft.public.excel.programming,pl.comp.programming