Article View: a.bsu.programming
Article #87274Re: Defferences between 3rd and 4th generation language
From: Donald Fisk
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 00:00
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 00:00
44 lines
2936 bytes
2936 bytes
TANG wrote: > > hi ! currently i'm looking for 3rd and 4th genaration language information. > hope somebody can help me. This isn't the answer you wanted, but it's an answer *about* your question, with an attempt at a direct answer towards the end. The first time I heard these terms was after the Japanese fifth generation project was announced. The five generations were for hardware and were valves, transistors, ICs, VLSIs, and massively parallel dataflow architectures. The last of these were supposed to run Prolog which didn't map particularly well onto the hardware. By definition then, Prolog was *the* fifth generation language. The fifth generation project was a notable failure for a variety of reasons I won't go into here. The term 4th generation language is then what etymologists would call a back-formation, as in the original definition, the terms were (with the exception of Prolog as a fifth- generation language) for hardware. To get back to your question, 4th generation languages were special purpose languages which allowed routine data processing tasks, with form-based user interfaces, to be developed quickly. They were usually proprietary. Third generation languages were the general purpose languages (notable COBOL and perhaps PL/1) which they were supposed to replace. > tang Le Hibou (ma propre opinion) -- "People help themselves to things if they think they will get away with it, even things they are unlikely to have much use for and cannot resell, such as traffic cones. In the UK we call these people 'students'." -- Joe Boswell
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<380242E3.18B685CC@inthan.be>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<38021d6e.0@news2.tm.net.my>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 110a07,1eaa4814f3bfec28,start X-Google-Attributes: gid110a07,public X-Google-Thread: fe105,1eaa4814f3bfec28,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfe105,public X-Google-Thread: fc8d0,1eaa4814f3bfec28,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfc8d0,public X-Google-Thread: 108717,1eaa4814f3bfec28,start X-Google-Attributes: gid108717,public X-Google-Thread: 10804c,1eaa4814f3bfec28,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10804c,public X-Google-Thread: 107d8b,1eaa4814f3bfec28,start X-Google-Attributes: gid107d8b,public X-Google-Thread: f87f8,1eaa4814f3bfec28,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf87f8,public X-Google-Thread: ffc1e,1eaa4814f3bfec28,start X-Google-Attributes: gidffc1e,public From: Donald Fisk <donald.fisk@inthan.be> Subject: Re: Defferences between 3rd and 4th generation language Date: 1999/10/11 Message-ID: <380242E3.18B685CC@inthan.be> X-Deja-AN: 535633409 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <38021d6e.0@news2.tm.net.my> X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: IH_B Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: a.bsu.programming,alt.mud.programming,alt.winsock.programming,comp.programming,comp.programming.threads,fj.os.ms-windows.programming,microsoft.public.excel.programming,pl.comp.programming