Article View: a2i.general
Article #619Re: http.rahul.net question
From: Bob R. Kenyon
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 00:00
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 00:00
30 lines
1737 bytes
1737 bytes
In article <897fnm$liu$1@samba.rahul.net>, Jeff Lacki <jeep@waltz.rahul.net> wrote: > So what is the final solution for accessing the HTTP server > here now? I havent tried using netscape at home since > this morning. It hasnt worked at least 2-3 days for me > at home. > > Is it still http.rahul.net 80? Is it that DNS number in > a previous post? Or do I use 'direct connection'? http.rahul.net and direct connection should both work fine. I think, but IANR, that if you're dialing in from the v.90 numbers, you don't need the http proxy any more at all. > Up until this am, I tried all three and they didnt seem > to work, this is why I ask now. Need access to tax > stuff on the web this weekend. Wow. Mine's been working absolutely perfectly. I haven't tried http.rahul.net for a while, but I'm using noads to great effect. Are you sure your machine doesn't have a configuration problem? What equipment and software are you using? -- Bob R. Kenyon Beautiful Downtown San Jose <http://www.bobrk.com/>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<898u1f$4o3$1@samba.rahul.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<897fnm$liu$1@samba.rahul.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 111b8f,a06e89eee7a0c485,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid111b8f,public
From: "Bob R. Kenyon" <c..ssl@45.usenet.us.com>
Subject: Re: http.rahul.net question
Date: 2000/02/26
Message-ID: <898u1f$4o3$1@samba.rahul.net>
X-Deja-AN: 590335949
References: <897fnm$liu$1@samba.rahul.net>
X-Face: ;uwDB0Mi*nYG(iz}KRpS>BF:pTMsho7DmDc.i7SX'o|dw?S%opNI&Z9cORX9<]GHV`6wgIeI.!<H@Eecy28=WAVJ.>?ZWqJuWTC$7|hq_F/DRn\}294d{5JP@ZQ[gQ*urN^lR481:Ji;K?~V
Organization: La Casita Nueva de las Pulgas
X-Comment: Encoded From: line allows replies that preserve original subject
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.0 (PPC)
Newsgroups: a2i.general