🚀 go-pugleaf

In <89v61b$1a3$1@samba.rahul.net> spp@bob.eecs.berkeley.edu writes:

>I don't mean to whine about this too much; a2i is still the
>best provider around; but I'd like to see some plan by a2i
>to ultimately improve service by getting rid of RSS blocking
>and similar non-conforming aspects of the email system.  I don't
>expect it to happen overnight, since it does involve resource
>allocation, but I'd at least like to see it stated as a goal.

Providing efficient unhindered mail delivery is one of the goals here.
Another is to cut down spam.  Another is to avoid having large numbers
of email messages, with fake return addresses, be bouncing around the
system waiting for a threed-day timeout.  In some cases, such as yours,
these goals are in conflict.  The technical cost of resolving this
conflict, while still allowing you to use the same email address, is
quite high.

This is why the recommended mechanism to be completely free of all
filtering done at our machines is to have your own domain.  The
technical cost of implementing that is quite low -- and in fact
effectively zero, because it has already been implemented.
-- 
(Rahul Dhesi)
a2i network support account <support@rahul.net>