🚀 go-pugleaf

Noam,

I think they are just buying transit. And as far as consistent
announcements - that all depends on the traffic mix. If you have enough
traffic going the right way, people will look the other way as far as
consistent announcements. (although in general terms, you are quite
correct - consistent announcements are expected).


Daniel Golding
Senior Network Engineer
NetRail, Inc.

On Sun, 2 Apr 2000 noam@noam.com wrote:

> > Sorry Noam, I don't think they have any intention of doing it in a normal
> > fashion in the future. This is how they want to get the benifits of having
> > a backbone without paying for one.
> 
> Do you want to peer with other providers?  If so, you're going to want to
> announce the same routes in each location.  This requires you to setup iBGP
> peering between pops so you know where to send the traffic to.  If you
> don't want to peer with other providers (or are content to peer with those
> providers who don't care about getting consistent announcements), then you
> can just setup a disjoint network and default into your upstream provider.
> 
> - Noam
> 
> -
> Send 'unsubscribe' in the body to 'list-request@inet-access.net' to leave.
> Eat sushi frequently.   inet@inet-access.net is the human contact address.
> 

-
Send 'unsubscribe' in the body to 'list-request@inet-access.net' to leave.
Eat sushi frequently.   inet@inet-access.net is the human contact address.