🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: a2i.lists.inet-access
Article #5786

RE: Pentium 133 vs 200 vs Pentium II

#5786
From: Brad Wilson
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 00:00
25 lines
1626 bytes
On Friday, November 21, 1997 12:52 PM, Jeff Halper [SMTP:jefflist@ihot.com] 
wrote:

> Anyone have any experience in what performance increase we can expect
> when upgrading from pentium 133?

Well, upgrading from a 133 to a 200 will be a standard 50% upgrade in CPU 
power (both use a 66MHz bus).  That doesn't mean much if you're not CPU 
bound.  The Pentium II will be appropriately faster, and add MMX, but I 
doubt MMX is a big concern for an ISP.  Are you really that CPU bound?  Our 
mail server and web servers are almost constantly disk bound, never getting 
over 10% CPU, on a Pentium 200.

> Is it a worthwile upgrade? Will it be be somehow noticeable to the users?

Knowing what services you're running, and whether you're maxxing out the 
CPU, helps.

-- Brad Wilson, student of Objectivism ------------ bradw at pobox.com --

  "I can learn to  co-exist with anything  but pain ... I can  learn to
   compromise  anything but my desires ... I can  learn to persist with
   anything but aiming low ... I can learn to close my eyes to anything
   but injustice ... You'll never ever win without a fight."  -- Rush
Technical Details
Message-ID: <inet-access.01BCF688.C3438AE0.bradw@pobox.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f61c3,7ce1c4ae1e69fac0,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf61c3,public
From: Brad Wilson <bradw@pobox.com>
Subject: RE: Pentium 133 vs 200 vs Pentium II
Date: 1997/11/21
Message-ID: <inet-access.01BCF688.C3438AE0.bradw@pobox.com>
X-Deja-AN: 291481936
X-To: "'inet-access@earth.com'" <inet-access@earth.com>
Reply-To: inet-access@earth.com
Organization: The Brads' Consulting
Newsgroups: a2i.lists.inet-access