Article View: a2i.lists.inet-access
Article #5786RE: Pentium 133 vs 200 vs Pentium II
From: Brad Wilson
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 1997 00:00
25 lines
1626 bytes
1626 bytes
On Friday, November 21, 1997 12:52 PM, Jeff Halper [SMTP:jefflist@ihot.com] wrote: > Anyone have any experience in what performance increase we can expect > when upgrading from pentium 133? Well, upgrading from a 133 to a 200 will be a standard 50% upgrade in CPU power (both use a 66MHz bus). That doesn't mean much if you're not CPU bound. The Pentium II will be appropriately faster, and add MMX, but I doubt MMX is a big concern for an ISP. Are you really that CPU bound? Our mail server and web servers are almost constantly disk bound, never getting over 10% CPU, on a Pentium 200. > Is it a worthwile upgrade? Will it be be somehow noticeable to the users? Knowing what services you're running, and whether you're maxxing out the CPU, helps. -- Brad Wilson, student of Objectivism ------------ bradw at pobox.com -- "I can learn to co-exist with anything but pain ... I can learn to compromise anything but my desires ... I can learn to persist with anything but aiming low ... I can learn to close my eyes to anything but injustice ... You'll never ever win without a fight." -- Rush
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<inet-access.01BCF688.C3438AE0.bradw@pobox.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f61c3,7ce1c4ae1e69fac0,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf61c3,public From: Brad Wilson <bradw@pobox.com> Subject: RE: Pentium 133 vs 200 vs Pentium II Date: 1997/11/21 Message-ID: <inet-access.01BCF688.C3438AE0.bradw@pobox.com> X-Deja-AN: 291481936 X-To: "'inet-access@earth.com'" <inet-access@earth.com> Reply-To: inet-access@earth.com Organization: The Brads' Consulting Newsgroups: a2i.lists.inet-access