Re: NetBlazer DEAD? Or what? ITK?

Article View: a2i.lists.netblazer-users

Article #23

Back to a2i.lists.netblazer-users Previous Next

#23

From: Kirk Yarina
Date: Mon, 04 May 1998 00:00

20 lines
1276 bytes

If you have access to Cisco's CCO try searching on MICA - they use the mica
portware in some of their products, and are still working out some bugs.
There's a field notice from 4/10 that says "The MICA portware version
2.2.5.0 can cause the MICA modems to go into a state where they will not
recover from errors without reflashing the modems or reloading the access
server."

Kirk Yarina

At 10:30 AM 5/4/98 -0400, you wrote:
>Maybe we should have all taken the deals other companies had for trading
>to their equipment, like Livingston, Ascend, USR or whoever. You don't
>hear much about the MicaBlazer or support for the 56K protocols for the
>granite boards, no release dates for and plans for the upgrades.
>
>Sascha Picchiantano wrote:
<snip>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <netblazer-users.3.0.5.32.19980504143321.03224ae0@up.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 112f80,71e3f169ed56a881,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid112f80,public
From: Kirk Yarina <kirkml@up.net>
Subject: Re: NetBlazer DEAD? Or what? ITK?
Date: 1998/05/04
Message-ID: <netblazer-users.3.0.5.32.19980504143321.03224ae0@up.net>
X-Deja-AN: 350617708
X-To: <netblazer-users@itk-tele.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Orig-Date: Mon, 04 May 1998 14:33:21 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Newsgroups: a2i.lists.netblazer-users