Article View: ab.general.
Article #3Re: You May Not Be Entitled to Your Spouse's Pension
From: Jason Moore
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 00:00
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 00:00
77 lines
4595 bytes
4595 bytes
--------------30CAD7A2C3DC975FA2A1FF8A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ken & Laura Chaddock wrote: > mary@electro.net wrote: > > > Does anyone know what the law says with regard to the exact number > > of years in age a "heterosexual" must be to collect pension, and the > > amount of income he/she must be earning? Also, does anyone know > > when these changes were enacted in parliament? > > The regulation is certainly not *secret*. You must be at least > 35 years of age to qualify for a surviver's pension, regardless of > your gender or sexual orientation. > It's no different than having to be 65 to qualify for an Old Age > Pension. > 35 does seem an arbitary age, why not 30, 0r 25 or 19 ? some have > argued that 35 is far TOO young, that it should be 45 or 50 ! Questions > like; why should a young "survivor" get a pension when they are still > young enough to have a good chance at enteringor re-entering the work > force come to mind. > > ...Ken I believe one has to earn (in wages not dividends interest or capital gain income) under $8500 in order to claim the pension. At least this is the supposed level for those claiming the CPP early. I say "supposed" because I have seen many people earn wages in excess of $8500 without paying any extraordinary penalty while collecting an early pension. I imagine that these rules would apply no matter what sexual orientation the couple happened to be (that's why it is called equality). --------------30CAD7A2C3DC975FA2A1FF8A Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> <html> <p>Ken & Laura Chaddock wrote: <blockquote TYPE=CITE>mary@electro.net wrote: <p>> Does anyone know what the law says with regard to the exact number <br>> of years in age a "heterosexual" must be to collect pension, and the <br>> amount of income he/she must be earning? Also, does anyone know <br>> when these changes were enacted in parliament? <p> The regulation is certainly not *secret*. You must be at least <br>35 years of age to qualify for a surviver's pension, regardless of <br>your gender or sexual orientation. <br> It's no different than having to be 65 to qualify for an Old Age <br>Pension. <br> 35 does seem an arbitary age, why not 30, 0r 25 or 19 ? some have <br>argued that 35 is far TOO young, that it should be 45 or 50 ! Questions <br>like; why should a young "survivor" get a pension when they are still <br>young enough to have a good chance at enteringor re-entering the work <br>force come to mind. <p>...Ken</blockquote> I believe one has to earn (in wages <b>not</b> dividends interest or capital gain income) <i>under</i> $8500 in order to claim the pension. At least this is the supposed level for those claiming the CPP early. I say "supposed" because I have seen many people earn wages in excess of $8500 without paying any extraordinary penalty while collecting an early pension. I imagine that these rules would apply no matter what sexual orientation the couple happened to be (that's why it is called <i>equality</i>). <br> </html> --------------30CAD7A2C3DC975FA2A1FF8A--
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3760A6EB.29F3BF69@bc.sympatico.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3760436a.26402410@news.cadvision.com> <37607B87.1C62@istar.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109a5e,ba2c656f10652ea7 X-Google-Attributes: gid109a5e,public X-Google-Thread: fb1ea,ba2c656f10652ea7 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1ea,public X-Google-Thread: fb374,ba2c656f10652ea7 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb374,public X-Google-Thread: 109f22,ba2c656f10652ea7 X-Google-Attributes: gid109f22,public X-Google-Thread: 114774,ba2c656f10652ea7 X-Google-Attributes: gid114774,public X-Google-Thread: fb626,ba2c656f10652ea7 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb626,public From: Jason Moore <Jason_Moore@bc.sympatico.ca> Subject: Re: You May Not Be Entitled to Your Spouse's Pension Date: 1999/06/10 Message-ID: <3760A6EB.29F3BF69@bc.sympatico.ca> X-Deja-AN: 488227109 References: <3760436a.26402410@news.cadvision.com> <37607B87.1C62@istar.ca> X-Accept-Language: en,fr-CA Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------30CAD7A2C3DC975FA2A1FF8A" X-Complaints-To: news@bctel.net X-Trace: news.bctel.net 929081123 209.53.82.39 (Thu, 10 Jun 1999 23:05:23 PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: Jason_Moore@bc.sympatico.ca NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 23:05:23 PDT Newsgroups: ab.general.,ab.politics,can.politics,alt.politics.reform,calgary.general,can.legal,alt.philosophy.law