🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: ab.general.
Article #3

Re: You May Not Be Entitled to Your Spouse's Pension

#3
From: Jason Moore
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 00:00
77 lines
4595 bytes
--------------30CAD7A2C3DC975FA2A1FF8A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



Ken & Laura Chaddock wrote:

> mary@electro.net wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know what the law says with regard to the exact number
> > of years in age a "heterosexual" must be to collect pension, and the
> > amount of income he/she must be earning?  Also, does anyone know
> > when these changes were enacted in parliament?
>
>    The regulation is certainly not *secret*. You must be at least
> 35 years of age to qualify for a surviver's pension, regardless of
> your gender or sexual orientation.
>    It's no different than having to be 65 to qualify for an Old Age
> Pension.
>    35 does seem an arbitary age, why not 30, 0r 25 or 19 ? some have
> argued that 35 is far TOO young, that it should be 45 or 50 ! Questions
> like; why should a young "survivor" get a pension when they are still
> young enough to have a good chance at enteringor re-entering the work
> force come to mind.
>
> ...Ken

I believe one has to earn (in wages not dividends interest or capital gain
income) under $8500 in order to claim the pension. At least this is the
supposed level for those claiming the CPP early. I say "supposed" because I
have seen many people earn wages in excess of $8500 without paying any
extraordinary penalty while collecting an early pension.  I imagine that
these rules would apply no matter what sexual orientation the couple
happened to be (that's why it is called equality).


--------------30CAD7A2C3DC975FA2A1FF8A
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
&nbsp;
<p>Ken &amp; Laura Chaddock wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>mary@electro.net wrote:
<p>> Does anyone know what the law says with regard to the exact number
<br>> of years in age a "heterosexual" must be to collect pension, and
the
<br>> amount of income he/she must be earning?&nbsp; Also, does anyone
know
<br>> when these changes were enacted in parliament?
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; The regulation is certainly not *secret*. You must be at
least
<br>35 years of age to qualify for a surviver's pension, regardless of
<br>your gender or sexual orientation.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp; It's no different than having to be 65 to qualify for
an Old Age
<br>Pension.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp; 35 does seem an arbitary age, why not 30, 0r 25 or 19
? some have
<br>argued that 35 is far TOO young, that it should be 45 or 50 ! Questions
<br>like; why should a young "survivor" get a pension when they are still
<br>young enough to have a good chance at enteringor re-entering the work
<br>force come to mind.
<p>...Ken</blockquote>
I believe one has to earn (in wages <b>not</b> dividends interest or capital
gain income) <i>under</i> $8500 in order to claim the pension. At least
this is the supposed level for those claiming the CPP early. I say "supposed"
because I have seen many people earn wages in excess of $8500 without paying
any extraordinary penalty while collecting an early pension.&nbsp; I imagine
that these rules would apply no matter what sexual orientation the couple
happened to be (that's why it is called <i>equality</i>).
<br>&nbsp;</html>

--------------30CAD7A2C3DC975FA2A1FF8A--
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3760A6EB.29F3BF69@bc.sympatico.ca>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <3760436a.26402410@news.cadvision.com> <37607B87.1C62@istar.ca>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109a5e,ba2c656f10652ea7
X-Google-Attributes: gid109a5e,public
X-Google-Thread: fb1ea,ba2c656f10652ea7
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1ea,public
X-Google-Thread: fb374,ba2c656f10652ea7
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb374,public
X-Google-Thread: 109f22,ba2c656f10652ea7
X-Google-Attributes: gid109f22,public
X-Google-Thread: 114774,ba2c656f10652ea7
X-Google-Attributes: gid114774,public
X-Google-Thread: fb626,ba2c656f10652ea7
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb626,public
From: Jason Moore <Jason_Moore@bc.sympatico.ca>
Subject: Re: You May Not Be Entitled to Your Spouse's Pension
Date: 1999/06/10
Message-ID: <3760A6EB.29F3BF69@bc.sympatico.ca>
X-Deja-AN: 488227109
References: <3760436a.26402410@news.cadvision.com> <37607B87.1C62@istar.ca>
X-Accept-Language: en,fr-CA
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------30CAD7A2C3DC975FA2A1FF8A"
X-Complaints-To: news@bctel.net
X-Trace: news.bctel.net 929081123 209.53.82.39 (Thu, 10 Jun 1999 23:05:23 PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: Jason_Moore@bc.sympatico.ca
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 23:05:23 PDT
Newsgroups: ab.general.,ab.politics,can.politics,alt.politics.reform,calgary.general,can.legal,alt.philosophy.law