🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <6g1d2g$tum$1@news.sas.ab.ca>, markw@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca () wrote:
>Socred (socred@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca) wrote:
>: THE ALBERTA SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY - OFFICIAL NEWS RELEASE
>: April 2, 1998
<RELEASE SNIPPED>
>: --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Your comments are right on the mark.  These things will happen and much of
>it has already happened, the CRTC for example has ruled that no
>broadcastor, including religious broadcastors, can say anything negative
>about homosexuality.  Hows that for living in a free country.
>
>Mark Waluk
>

Mark, it's pathetic. I am a bisexual man who agrees with you. Why _shouldn't_ 
a person be able to say anything negative about homosexuality? I think that if 
freedom of speech doesn't defend unpopular speech, then it isn't worth a pinch 
of coonshit. Please understand that there _are_ gay and bisexual people who 
feel you have a perfect right to state and to act according to your beliefs as 
long as your actions do not involve the instigation of aggression--and a 
refusal to support, hire or rent to someone is NOT an act of aggression; it is 
merely a refusal to deal with someone. I should have that right and so should 
you.

Ron