🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: ab.general
Article #27985

Re: Should personal ammounts of Marijuanna be decriminalized?

#27985
From: art healer
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 00:00
31 lines
3009 bytes
Mark <mark1w@N.O.S.P.A.M.oanet.com> wrote in message
news:38f28f9b$1_2@news.oanet.com...
>
> Glenn Olson <kaos@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca> wrote in message
> news:9au0fs4er49vh2sps1hd5k8nnm23870oar@4ax.com...
> > On Sat, 8 Apr 2000 20:38:59 -0700, "Mark"
> > <mark1w@N.O.S.P.A.M.oanet.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Crack and marijuana both have the same purpose, to get one high.
> >
> > Gee, isn't that the purpose of alcohol and nicotine as well?
> >
>
> Not for me, I don't like getting drunk.
>
> Markw
>
I've been following this thread a bit and it seems to me the discussion has
been swayed back and forth by "scientific studies". Do you really believe
that any present day democratic government has the citizens needs and
desires in mind? These "studies" (not unlike statistics) can be used and
twisted by people on either side of the fence. I believe the better question
to be . . . how much more government do you want in your life and does what
government you do have serve everyone equally? And possibly even a better
question would be. . . do you believe that when something is made "illegal"
by a government, that the problem just goes away? It takes so much of your
hard earned tax dollars to "regulate" the use of "illegal substances and to
what avail? But it does seem to validate in some odd and unfounded way the
justification citizens find for employing such sloth.
>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <8db5hn$ea7$1@reader.nmix.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <85b89f$kuc$1@burn.ab.videon.ca> <38A92587.660E59AE@home.com> <38af8425$1@news.iprimus.com.au> <38b006a4_5@news.oanet.com> <slrn8ed6u6.d8.aeon@bullet.20-eyes.com> <38e76e8f_6@news.oanet.com> <8c9d01$6og$1@galileo.mostlylinux.ab.ca> <38ebef27_3@news.oanet.com> <8ci4qa$big$1@galileo.mostlylinux.ab.ca> <38ed1b18_1@news.oanet.com> <8ckre5$rv8$1@galileo.mostlylinux.ab.ca> <38ef5275_5@news.oanet.com> <8codcr$c40$1@galileo.mostlylinux.ab.ca> <38efe81d_4@news.oanet.com> <9au0fs4er49vh2sps1hd5k8nnm23870oar@4ax.com> <38f28f9b$1_2@news.oanet.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10dfca,d81725af2c74921e
X-Google-Attributes: gid10dfca,public
X-Google-Thread: 109a5e,d81725af2c74921e
X-Google-Attributes: gid109a5e,public
X-Google-Thread: fb626,d81725af2c74921e
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb626,public
X-Google-Thread: 112f74,d81725af2c74921e
X-Google-Attributes: gid112f74,public
X-Google-Thread: 10d2a3,d81725af2c74921e
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d2a3,public
From: "art healer" <arthealer@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Should personal ammounts of Marijuanna be decriminalized?
Date: 2000/04/15
Message-ID: <8db5hn$ea7$1@reader.nmix.net>
X-Deja-AN: 611702384
References: <85b89f$kuc$1@burn.ab.videon.ca> <38A92587.660E59AE@home.com> <38af8425$1@news.iprimus.com.au> <38b006a4_5@news.oanet.com> <slrn8ed6u6.d8.aeon@bullet.20-eyes.com> <38e76e8f_6@news.oanet.com> <8c9d01$6og$1@galileo.mostlylinux.ab.ca> <38ebef27_3@news.oanet.com> <8ci4qa$big$1@galileo.mostlylinux.ab.ca> <38ed1b18_1@news.oanet.com> <8ckre5$rv8$1@galileo.mostlylinux.ab.ca> <38ef5275_5@news.oanet.com> <8codcr$c40$1@galileo.mostlylinux.ab.ca> <38efe81d_4@news.oanet.com> <9au0fs4er49vh2sps1hd5k8nnm23870oar@4ax.com> <38f28f9b$1_2@news.oanet.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
X-Complaints-To: news@nmix.net
X-Trace: reader.nmix.net 955849079 14663 209.194.200.50 (16 Apr 2000 01:37:59 GMT)
Organization: NMIX
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Reply-To: "art healer" <arthealer99@yahoo.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 Apr 2000 01:37:59 GMT
Newsgroups: ab.general,edm.general,ab.politics,edm.politics,calgary.general