🚀 go-pugleaf

> "Eric Bram" <embram@worldnet.att.net> wrote i  Apparently there IS a
> real Anti-Spam bill going through Congress ...  here's a link to some
> testimony given  at a legislative hearing for it, by someone from the
> Cato Institute before  the House Judiciary Committee:
> http://www.house.gov/judiciary/crews_051001.htm

Testy comments:

I always knew it could happen - someone who can not only spell, but
reason also, would come out for spam.  (sigh) I visited the Cato page
at: http://www.cato.org/  The Cato testimony was given by Wayne Crews,
their Director of Technology Policy.   You can reach him at:
wcrews@cato.org

My impression is that he is caught up in the theoretical beauty of
"Promoting Public Policy Based on Individual Liberty, Limited
Government, Free Markets and Peace." to the point where he is blind to
the current state of the net, and the relatively modest regulations that
would allow us to battle spammers on even ground.

These are other people who work there.  Since they put their addresses
out where any passing 'bot can harvest them, I doubt they will mind my
listing them here, in case you should want to ask his co-workers how
they feel about it:

dbandow@cato.org
pbasham@cato.org
abiggs@cato.org
dboaz@cato.org
rbalko@cato.org
pbenjamin@cato.org
jbrito@cato.org
mchapman@cato.org
cjl@cato.org
slincico@cato.org
jmarkels@cato.org
rpollock@cato.org
eporter@cato.org
vwalston@cato.org

lalbanes@cato.org
bborens@cato.org
sfollansbee@cato.org
cklein@cato.org
jleyland@cato.org
smiller@cato.org
ssullivan@cato.org
bwyche@cato.org
schamber@cato.org
aelliott@cato.org
lmajor@cato.org
alanp@cato.org
christier@cato.org
astevens@cato.org
webmaster@cato.org.
service@cato.org.
subscriptions@cato.org.
events@cato.org.
cklein@cato.org
media@cato.org.
intern@cato.org