Article View: adobe.acrobat.reader
Article #13615Re: possibly dumb question
From: Claudio Gonz�lez
Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 18:04
Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 18:04
5 lines
1407 bytes
1407 bytes
DW, I did not want to reply until your questions had been completely answered in the original thread, which seems to have just happened. No offense; only that you opened a new topic with a completely innocent question, which was innocently and completely answered by two people -one of them me. And when you read these answers, you wrote that your problem was quite a lot more complex and in fact was a follow up of an ongoing topic. This is confusing for other users of the forums, and most often than not it leads unnecessarily to two or more parallel threads on the same subject. Fortunately, it didn't happen in this case. But perhaps you noticed that in my second message I did not notice I was dealing with the same person...
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ef8714e.5@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!newsfeed.online.be!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebXReferences:
<ef8714e.-1@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109513,2683001cf3ac0788 X-Google-Attributes: gid109513,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-12 11:37:26 PST From: "Claudio Gonz�lez" <gonsacla@terra.cl> Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!newsfeed.online.be!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebX Newsgroups: adobe.acrobat.reader Subject: Re: possibly dumb question Message-ID: <ef8714e.5@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4> Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 11:04:55 -0700 References: <ef8714e.-1@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4> Lines: 14 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit