Article View: adobe.after.effects
Article #218Re: speed change between CS3 and CS4?
From: Mylenium
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:51
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:51
10 lines
1398 bytes
1398 bytes
Maybe CS5?
I don't think it would be a favorable model. The beauty of AE is, that it just allows so many different workflows and once you commit yourself to a specific, hardware-dependent way of working, you loose that. That's the biggest failure in Motion - complex stuff is simply not possible, because the hardware acceleration eventually gives up and then, without it, it's a lot worse than AE. AE should simply render faster and more efficient, so it takes less time to build the previews and it should have smarter ways of keeping cached data (like not loosing the disk cache frames when exiting the program). Once that works, you could think of ways to adjust interactively during looping RAM previews for instance, which achieves the same goal, but with much greater flexibility...
Mylenium
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<59b86cd0.2@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossingReferences:
<59b86cd0.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 105699,dd45889674a10ca7 X-Google-Attributes: gid105699,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: Mylenium@adobeforums.com Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing Newsgroups: adobe.after.effects Subject: Re: speed change between CS3 and CS4? Message-ID: <59b86cd0.2@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:51:34 -0700 References: <59b86cd0.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Lines: 15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit