Article View: adobe.after.effects
Article #48287Re: AE memory/3D camera pan question
From: Troy McFarland
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 20:31
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 20:31
5 lines
1472 bytes
1472 bytes
Hey Navarro and Rick, Just wanted to let ya know how it went. I went ahead and turned off layers that the camera wasn't actively seeing. This took a while, probably about 1 1/2 to 2 hours. (I didn't mention this to you originally, but not only was I dealing with a 4000x3000 comp, I was actually cross fading between 6 layers, all at 400 x 3000!!) Then, I replaced the JPG stills with the video source. The final render of the 45 second pan took about 1 1/2 hours. Not too bad at all. Thanks for the layer tip, as I'm sure that helped. I haven't rendered the same project with all layers always turned on, but I might do so in a few days just to see how much longer it would have taken. Thanks again. -Troy
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ef8630c.4@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!iad-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebXReferences:
<ef8630c.-1@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 105699,ba5e0eab869eab6d X-Google-Attributes: gid105699,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-10 14:07:42 PST From: "Troy McFarland" <troy.mcfarland@dynamix.com> Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!iad-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebX Newsgroups: adobe.after.effects Subject: Re: AE memory/3D camera pan question Message-ID: <ef8630c.4@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4> Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 13:31:59 -0700 References: <ef8630c.-1@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4> Lines: 15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit