Re: Postscript vs. Default Fonts

Article View: adobe.atm.type.macintosh

Article #322

Back to adobe.atm.type.macintosh Previous Next

#322

From: Neil_Keller
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 18:24

3 lines
1135 bytes

Note that some prepress houses insist upon PostScript fonts because of "old wives' tales" about font compatibility -- or they haven't updated their rips and cannot handle today's technologies. Any modern facility should be able to handle PostScript (Type 1), TrueType, and OpenType, as long as the fonts are legitimate and properly constructed. If not, look elsewhere.

Neil

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3bc224dc.3@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns14feed!worldnet.att.net!63.218.45.11!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!newsfeed.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!news.musoftware.de!news.albasani.net!news.isoc.lu!webcrossing

References: <3bc224dc.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: f61ed,6b26a8d36444479
X-Google-Attributes: gidf61ed,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: Neil_Keller@adobeforums.com
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns14feed!worldnet.att.net!63.218.45.11!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!newsfeed.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!news.musoftware.de!news.albasani.net!news.isoc.lu!webcrossing
Newsgroups: adobe.atm.type.macintosh
Subject: Re: Postscript vs. Default Fonts
Message-ID: <3bc224dc.3@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 10:24:12 -0800
References: <3bc224dc.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 8
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message