Re: Frequency Analysis not to be trusted!

Article View: adobe.audition.windows

Article #2735

Back to adobe.audition.windows Previous Next

#2735

From: SteveG
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 12:03

10 lines
1150 bytes


      Is that different from the scanning function in the Audition version?




It's a lot easier to use, because it's real-time, and also has a peak history function built into it, which is adjustable in 6 steps between 5mS and infinite. Also, it can do a critical-band display as well, but this won't really give you any more information than the 1/3 octave display, which is the one I tend to use.

The Audition scan is good if you want an average from a particular higlighted section, but not as useful as the Ozone analyser, which I've always thought very highly of.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3bbb9af0.2@webx.la2eafNXanI>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!quokka.wn.com.au!webx

References: <3bbb9af0.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 1f0032,f71795bc798bbc8f
X-Google-Attributes: gid1f0032,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: SteveG <member@adobeforums.com>
Newsgroups: adobe.audition.windows
Subject: Re: Frequency Analysis not to be trusted!
Message-ID: <3bbb9af0.2@webx.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 05:03:19 -0700
References: <3bbb9af0.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 11
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!quokka.wn.com.au!webx

Reply to Parent Message