Article View: adobe.audition.windows
Article #2763Re: Working in 96000 / 32-bit
From: dstdean
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:35
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:35
12 lines
947 bytes
947 bytes
Vincent,
When you say
I may as well just carry on working in 44/16.
you have got half of it right: don't upsample from the 44.1kHz, but DO convert to 32-bit for processing, then dither down to 16-bit for the final product.
--Dean
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3bbb890e.8@webx.la2eafNXanI>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!news.moat.net!nntp.waia.asn.au!202.72.130.18.MISMATCH!quokka.wn.com.au!webxReferences:
<3bbb890e.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI> <3bbb890e.7@webx.la2eafNXanI>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 1f0032,133149ba8d85d9c0 X-Google-Attributes: gid1f0032,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: dstdean@adobeforums.com Newsgroups: adobe.audition.windows Subject: Re: Working in 96000 / 32-bit Message-ID: <3bbb890e.8@webx.la2eafNXanI> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 04:35:32 -0700 References: <3bbb890e.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI> <3bbb890e.7@webx.la2eafNXanI> Lines: 11 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!news.moat.net!nntp.waia.asn.au!202.72.130.18.MISMATCH!quokka.wn.com.au!webx