🚀 go-pugleaf

Bob Katz (in what has to be a rather old quote) seems dangerously close (in the last para the Neil has quoted) to saying that reissuing a 16/44.1 recording in a "20-bit (24-bit) 88.2 kHz DVD" will sound better than the original - and I thought that old chestnut had been laid to rest long ago. I guess the question is, what exactly does he mean by "if properly reprocessed"?

      I am working with tracks from various artists/albums.




Vincent Z is starting with CDs - I think - so, aside from the possibility that "remastering" can beneficially be undertaken using 32 bits for accuracy in some situations (depending on the transform being undertaken), it really seems unnecessary to go further - and especially if this is just for his private purposes.