Working in 96000 / 32-bit

Article View: adobe.audition.windows

Article #2812

Back to adobe.audition.windows Previous Next

#2812

From: Vincent_Z
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 03:40

1 lines
909 bytes

Okay, so recently I've been converting all tracks to 96000/32 because apparantly mastering seems to sound better. I am working with tracks from various artists/albums. Personally, I can't hear much difference? Is it really worth the time to convert tracks to 96000/32 from 44000/16. I am burning audio CDs, not DVDs. Plus from what I've read, the dithering process supposedly cuts out samples anyway.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3bbb890e.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!quokka.wn.com.au!webx

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 1f0032,133149ba8d85d9c0,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid1f0032,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: Vincent_Z@adobeforums.com
Newsgroups: adobe.audition.windows
Subject: Working in 96000 / 32-bit
Message-ID: <3bbb890e.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:40:56 -0700
Lines: 6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!quokka.wn.com.au!webx