Re: Dithering and the Noise Shaping Paradox

Article View: adobe.audition.windows

Article #2883

Back to adobe.audition.windows Previous Next

#2883

From: TimothyDavid
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:05

13 lines
1124 bytes

Yes, I finally get it!

Mr. Wilkes your explanation was perfect and well written, thank you. Also, SteveG I really think the information you provided in your post should be added to the Hints & Tips or atleast the Knowledgebase.

I think Arnyk summed it up wonderfully:

"Perhaps you were mislead into thinking that differences
among different kinds of adequate dither were going to be
mind-boggling."

Thanks guys, you really gave me all the info I needed to understand dithering noise shaping.

Timothy.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3bbb80b6.4@webx.la2eafNXanI>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!nntp.waia.asn.au!202.72.130.18.MISMATCH!quokka.wn.com.au!webx

References: <3bbb80b6.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 1f0032,5c559eb7035a81d
X-Google-Attributes: gid1f0032,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: TimothyDavid@adobeforums.com
Newsgroups: adobe.audition.windows
Subject: Re: Dithering and the Noise Shaping Paradox
Message-ID: <3bbb80b6.4@webx.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:05:42 -0700
References: <3bbb80b6.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 16
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!nntp.waia.asn.au!202.72.130.18.MISMATCH!quokka.wn.com.au!webx

Reply to Parent Message