🚀 go-pugleaf

<Joseph_Ashford@adobeforums.com> wrote in message
news:3bbb6938.6@webx.la2eafNXanI

> The only reason this is a curiousity to me is the fact
> that so many reps come in here and pitch us on various
> DAW's that record at 24bit/96kHz.

Let me introduce you to a *new* DAW that you seem to be
unfamiliar with: Audition/CEP. ;-)

If you've got the audio interface hardware, Audition/CEP
will handle (record, play, edit, and apply EFX to) audio
files with sample rates up to at least 10 MHz or 10,000 KHz.

>They all seem to think  this is the new Holy Grail.

A nice high-sample rate audio inteface would be the M-Audio
Audiophile 24/192 which runs reliably at 192 KHz. While far
less than 10 MHz...

> Our AA records at  32bit/44,100 or 48,000 depending on who
plays with it,
> then auto plays back at 16/44 etc.

Back in the days when 96 KHz was the bee's knees in sample
rates I made a number of recordings with a DPA 4007 mic,
certified to be reasonably flat to about 42 KHz. You can
listen to them and downsampled versions of them by
downloading files from

http://www.pcabx.com/technical/sample_rates/index.htm

> We have no complaints,  so are the guru's trying to push
24/96?

It's the tyranny of numbers.

Bigger numbers impress smaller boys, it seems.