Article View: adobe.creative.suite.mac
Article #388Re: Suitcase or FontExplorer?
From: Buko
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:53
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:53
8 lines
808 bytes
808 bytes
Why did you choose FontAgent Pro?
It does not screw up InDesign like suitcase. Font Explorer was OK when it was free, but the best Is FontAgent Pro.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<59b807d4.4@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossingReferences:
<59b807d4.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 1effee,410bba0600292a19 X-Google-Attributes: gid1effee,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: Buko <buko@bybuko.com> Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing Newsgroups: adobe.creative.suite.mac Subject: Re: Suitcase or FontExplorer? Message-ID: <59b807d4.4@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:53:48 -0800 References: <59b807d4.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Lines: 7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Original-Lines: 4