🚀 go-pugleaf

Steve,
Well here we go again, rumors and rumors abound... My information is DIRECTLY from ADOBE over the course of one month on the subject.. Emphatically denied that they were working on the problem and told several times "NOT GOING TO FIX, THE SUBJECT IS CLOSED" Now what would you say, the buggy man told you so it must be true? With all do respect to those you respect, are they drawing a paycheck from adobe? If I'm wrong ... LET"S HEAR AN OFFICIAL STATEMENT even knowledging the PROBLEM. How could I possibly mislead when I am merely repeating what high level techs informed me of, and they do draw a paycheck from adobe. Anyone needing names, dates etc. need only ask. I wouldn't think they'd be in any kind of trouble for giving out information as tech advisors at the levels I was working with, would you agree. I just didn't accept it from one fellow, I kept going higher and higher till there was no higher. Now for the LJ4's ... we've been doing exactly what I state (and others have) for years, probably more then I want to admit to with GREAT success. So, I would say to you, do what you do and we'll do what works for us.. Not to get into a P____G match, but we handle some of the highest quality advertising there is, some of which I know, unless you live in a shell, you have seen. So what works for one is not what should work for all. Now back to the subject.. Where does adobe acknowledge this problem, I haven�t found it anywhere nor do I see a statement BEFORE a buyer buys. Postscript level2, Hp LJ 4's ("the family") seems should have been tested without thinking about it, just ask the many who have them and you know there are many.