Article View: adobe.framemaker.sgml
Article #289Re: DITA/FM8 topic misbehavior
From: Toby_P_Green
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:22
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:22
5 lines
1393 bytes
1393 bytes
Hello, fm-xref is defined in our EDD; it's a suboptimal element to use but supposedly the more effective conversion from basic FrameMaker crossrefs. It is associated with a number of possible formats defined in our template- in terms of support files, all 4 of the basic topic types are the same. I am also pretty confident that it is not a structure issue, since placing both fm-xref and image elements under reference elements within a document that contains a parent topic or task element still causes the problem. I'm not sure what could cause a specific change in file handling based on the first (non dita) element in the topic. AFAIK the read-write rules are not at fault here, and ditafm.ini controls only global import/export options so I don't think it's to blame either.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<59b79573.1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossingReferences:
<59b79573.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fcc08,b0251328f01e897f X-Google-Attributes: gidfcc08,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: Toby_P_Green@adobeforums.com Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing Newsgroups: adobe.framemaker.sgml Subject: Re: DITA/FM8 topic misbehavior Message-ID: <59b79573.1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:22:23 -0800 References: <59b79573.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Lines: 15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit