Re: FrameMaker 9 Installation

Article View: adobe.framemaker

Article #1025

#1025

From: Art Campbell
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:15

5 lines
920 bytes

1. I would pass. I think the Add On is just the Distiller that has always shipped, and would be less than the full version you already have.

2. I think you'd have to test. But I habitually don't use SaveAs because in the past it invoked a different work flow. Don't know if that's still the same or has changed in 9.

Art

Technical Details

Message-ID: <59b79291.0@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing

References: <59b79291.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: fd315,66c128d59b2a9561
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd315,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: "Art Campbell" <art.campbell@gmail.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing
Newsgroups: adobe.framemaker
Subject: Re: FrameMaker 9 Installation
Message-ID: <59b79291.0@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 06:15:26 -0800
References: <59b79291.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 8
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message