Article View: adobe.framemaker
Article #21540Re: OSX version of Framemaker 8 ???
From: Thomas Michanek
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 20:12
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 20:12
42 lines
3214 bytes
3214 bytes
> How can we plan unless they tell us their intentions. > > Once you tell people what to expect from your software development process > - something that's almost impossible to predict accurately - you'll be > spending all your time explaining why you're not meeting expectations. I honestly think this is a matter of how you make your intentions known. If you express yourself in marketing-mumbo-jumbo-speak that easily could be interpreted as promises, I can see you would risk such a scenario. But you could very well announce, without going into details, what your priorities are for the next release, perhaps just talking about broad areas such as "XML support" or whatever. Of course you would include a disclaimer that priorities or resources may change, but it would still give customers a reasonable chance to make decisions for the future. The fact is that FM development within Adobe, at least up until now, has largely been controlled by the wishes of the largest license holders. Adobe must meet these expectations, or they risk losing the revenue from such large upgrades. So, in practice, the contents of the next release is known very well within Adobe, at least in broad terms. Unless this move to India really will change how the "business case" for FM is formulated within Adobe. There are more ways than one to make money out of a product like FM... > It's bad business to tell the future until you are certain of what's to come. Which honestly is a lot sooner than Adobe is announcing today... I remember when an Adobe reseller could tell me the exact release date of a new FM release, but couldn't say a word of its contents. If you have set a release date, then you have finalized development and set up production, meaning you have a product with ready-made features. The only thing that could trip you up are production problems or finding last-minute bugs, but this doesn't affect the contents of the release. So what stops you from revealing what's in the release? Wouldn't that actually increase the interest of the upcoming release? -- /Thomas Michanek, FrameMaker/UNIX/MIF expert Technical Communicator, Uppsala, Sweden http://go.to/framers/
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5EED322C7862621FA728E5C8A76CB72C@in.WebX.la2eafNXanI>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!64.152.100.70.MISMATCH!sjc70.webusenet.com!c03.atl99!news.webusenet.com!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebXReferences:
<1de748ee.-1@WebX.la2eafNXanI> <1de748ee.11@WebX.la2eafNXanI>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd315,29c332cfda78c055 X-Google-Attributes: gidfd315,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-28 12:38:02 PST From: "Thomas Michanek" <thomas.michanek@telia.com> Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-06!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!64.152.100.70.MISMATCH!sjc70.webusenet.com!c03.atl99!news.webusenet.com!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebX Newsgroups: adobe.framemaker Subject: Re: OSX version of Framemaker 8 ??? Message-ID: <5EED322C7862621FA728E5C8A76CB72C@in.WebX.la2eafNXanI> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:12:36 -0800 References: <1de748ee.-1@WebX.la2eafNXanI> <1de748ee.11@WebX.la2eafNXanI> Lines: 43 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit