Article View: adobe.framemaker
Article #2271Table continuation variable: philosophical question
From: Ed_H
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:06
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:06
9 lines
1384 bytes
1384 bytes
My apologies in advance if this is too off-topic. The Table Continuation variable (and its companion, the Table Sheet variable) are useful tools. But how necessary are they? I ask because using the variables involves a certain amount of overhead (particularly the Table Sheet variable, when used in a table footer), and I'm not convinced the effort is worth it. These are just software user guides we're doing here, not aviation specs or military schematics. I can't imagine that our users won't be smart enough to flip the page to see if there's more information. Within my current group there are opposing forces on the necessity of using these variables. Does anyone here know of any studies into this? Or do any of you have any particular insight that will drive this standoff one way or another? Thanks!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<59b69820.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news4us.nl!webcrossingShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fd315,93c63fbd205c2e28,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfd315,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: Ed_H@adobeforums.com Newsgroups: adobe.framemaker Subject: Table continuation variable: philosophical question Message-ID: <59b69820.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:06:30 -0700 Lines: 20 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news4us.nl!webcrossing