🚀 go-pugleaf

      Yeah. I also like the push for the new 3Ghz processors for home use. Aside
      from the true gamers and dweebs like us who do work at home, who really
      needs something that fast? I'll admit though, I'd love one. *vbg*




Three words: WebWorks Publisher Professional. It's clock-cycle dependent, methinks you'd see some measurable gains by getting a faster chip.

      One print vendor I work with related a story about a customer who returned
      an ad slick with a request to increase the yellow saturation by 2%, to
      "give it a warmer feel". They of course made the modification, but the
      two were indistinguishable, even for the customer.




Sounds fair. This industry is full of theorists and academics, and the like, who've never actually tried or investigated the things they profess as true. For example, ask the graphic artist or press guy what minimum resolution you need on a screen capture image for a 133 lpi offset press, and they'll adamantly declare that 266 ppi would be the absolute minimum. But, if they tried even 188 ppi for their photographs, they'd see their assumtion was off-base. And, when they see how well a 120 ppi screen capture works, they'll further question their preconceptions.

Where were we?

Cheers and lotsa grins,

Sean