Article View: adobe.framemaker
Article #24495Re: Ventura 10 vs FrameMaker
From: Sean
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 05:07
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 05:07
7 lines
1279 bytes
1279 bytes
Dunno. Feel free to post. If it's like previous versions, it'll have a slick interface and a lot of features, many of which are poorly implemented or unstable. Maybe they've even dumped their installed base, again? LOL! Seriously, it'll have more features and be slicker 'n FrameMaker, but FrameMaker has always been about stability and throughput. And, for those of you doing online help, too, what support is there for VP? Gonna do the RTF thing as usual? WWP Pro and Mif2Go are excellent in this regards with FrameMaker. Cheers, Sean
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1de63c95.0@WebX.la2eafNXanI>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-04!supernews.com!newsfeed.gamma.ru!Gamma.RU!newsfeed.rt.ru!rt.ru!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebXReferences:
<1de63c95.-1@WebX.la2eafNXanI>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd315,d407d28cd2d0851d X-Google-Attributes: gidfd315,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-10-21 03:28:02 PST From: Sean <member@adobeforums.com> Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-04!supernews.com!newsfeed.gamma.ru!Gamma.RU!newsfeed.rt.ru!rt.ru!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebX Newsgroups: adobe.framemaker Subject: Re: Ventura 10 vs FrameMaker Message-ID: <1de63c95.0@WebX.la2eafNXanI> Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 22:07:07 -0700 References: <1de63c95.-1@WebX.la2eafNXanI> Lines: 14 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit