Article View: adobe.framemaker
Article #25472Re: Context Sensitive Help: RoboHelp 2000 vs. WebWorks Publisher pro
From: Poh-Chuen Escoffier
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:03
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:03
2 lines
1213 bytes
1213 bytes
That was a top class review of WWP Pro and FrameMaker. I am also evaluating the use of FrameMaker and WWP. Since budget is a consideration, my question is: Since FrameMaker comes with the standard version of WWP, what are the advantages of purchasing WWP Pro? I am aware that you must use the Pro versions in order to customise the look and feel. However, would the standard look offered by the standard WWP suffice? Many thanks for any comments or reasons to justify WWP Pro.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ef7ecc6.70@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!newsfeed.news2me.com!proxad.net!gatel-ffm!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebXReferences:
<ef7ecc6.-1@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd315,7b19c53cd2ef3bb4 X-Google-Attributes: gidfd315,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-07-09 18:08:29 PST From: "Poh-Chuen Escoffier" <pescoffier@lumley.com.au> Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-08!supernews.com!newsfeed.news2me.com!proxad.net!gatel-ffm!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebX Newsgroups: adobe.framemaker Subject: Re: Context Sensitive Help: RoboHelp 2000 vs. WebWorks Publisher pro Message-ID: <ef7ecc6.70@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4> Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:03:56 -0700 References: <ef7ecc6.-1@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4> Lines: 8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit