Article View: adobe.framemaker
Article #25757Re: WebWorks standard in FM7 -- better than the last?
From: Roger Blumberg
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 07:51
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 07:51
36 lines
2443 bytes
2443 bytes
Thanks. um, but, if you don't use it how do you know that it's not useless? If there's only one yucky template per output type, and you can't map your existing tags to anything but 4 default para tags and perhaps 2 character tags (and not even a body italic for God's sake), and you can't create any custom templates nor custom tags/mappings, I call that useless. It's really nothing more than a tease. Not enough function to make it usable to anyone I'd say. Adobe is doing no-one a favor -- no-one who can't afford $850 more for the Pro (read functional) version to make the Framemaker html export (hence the touted "single sourcing" functionality) usable, i.e.a reality. WW-Standard is really just a function crippled demo, a tease to get you to spend another $850. Try it sometime Sean. >If it is insufficient, don't install it If I'd never installed it, I wouldn't have known what it could or couldn't do, would I. Thanks Roger "Sean" <lists@pubsink.com> wrote in message news:ef94eef.0@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4... > No difference. > > WWP SE is a lite version of the product that acts only as an export filter to XML or HTML. If it is insufficient, don't install it. I'm not sure that WWP SE is useless, but then 1) I don't know what you need and 2) I don't use it myself, I use WWP Pro. > > WWP Pro is $850 and is online-help authoring software. It is priced competitively with other such software, for example RoboHelp. > > Cheers, > > Sean
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BCFB32B78F71805A010418C61DB0851A@in.WebX.aaQKaf7vad4>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!213.73.101.75!eusc.inter.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebXReferences:
<65AB5EFFC8478DE22A87AC7666608F33@in.WebX.aaQKaf7vad4> <ef94eef.0@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd315,28644e6fd8648fa3 X-Google-Attributes: gidfd315,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-27 01:08:52 PST From: "Roger Blumberg" <rblumberg@jps.net> Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!213.73.101.75!eusc.inter.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebX Newsgroups: adobe.framemaker Subject: Re: WebWorks standard in FM7 -- better than the last? Message-ID: <BCFB32B78F71805A010418C61DB0851A@in.WebX.aaQKaf7vad4> Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 00:51:28 -0700 References: <65AB5EFFC8478DE22A87AC7666608F33@in.WebX.aaQKaf7vad4> <ef94eef.0@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4> Lines: 38 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit