Article View: adobe.framemaker
Article #26322Re: The Best Alternative to Framemaker
From: steve shaw
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2002 09:21
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2002 09:21
3 lines
1405 bytes
1405 bytes
Robert Ambos, I was interested to hear your positive comments for Indesign. I really like v2, but the lack of many FM features makes it a pain, even if the end result looks good. My current project has come from FM and is now in ID with many correction/additions and I feel torn between the two (As a MAC user I have no experience of Ventura) There is so much comment on this forum that FM's code is ancient and that it needs not to be updated, but rewritten, that I think it would better if Adobe just got on and added the requisite features to their flagship program. Perhaps through a plug-in with FM features and/or a version of Incopy that provided wordprocessing and advanced book features.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ef84e3f.25@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!supernews.com!isdnet!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebXReferences:
<ef84e3f.-1@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd315,1a636374222bb1b8,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfd315,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-04 02:37:44 PST From: "steve shaw" <steve.shaw@btinternet.com> Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!supernews.com!isdnet!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebX Newsgroups: adobe.framemaker Subject: Re: The Best Alternative to Framemaker Message-ID: <ef84e3f.25@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4> Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 02:21:04 -0700 References: <ef84e3f.-1@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4> Lines: 11 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit