Article View: adobe.framemaker
Article #26386Re: The Best Alternative to Framemaker
From: Horace Smith
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 20:13
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 20:13
3 lines
1024 bytes
1024 bytes
No one seems to have mentioned in this discussion the wonderful ability of Word 97 to, after you have torn every hair out of your head getting something to work, lose some or all of it in storage -- if not overnight (it can do that, too), then long term. I haven't seem much of that in Frame. Yet.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ef84e3f.20@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!supernews.com!priapus.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!hermes.visi.com!eusc.inter.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebXReferences:
<ef84e3f.-1@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd315,fcfa9de7cbc67d0b X-Google-Attributes: gidfd315,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-28 13:38:01 PST From: "Horace Smith" <horace.smith@sercelus.com> Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!supernews.com!priapus.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!hermes.visi.com!eusc.inter.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebX Newsgroups: adobe.framemaker Subject: Re: The Best Alternative to Framemaker Message-ID: <ef84e3f.20@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4> Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 13:13:56 -0700 References: <ef84e3f.-1@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4> Lines: 6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit