Article View: adobe.framemaker
Article #2650Re: Converting to word
From: Van_Kurtz
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 17:20
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 17:20
8 lines
1163 bytes
1163 bytes
Ingrid, Read Thomas Michanek's previous post 10 times and then read it 10 times more. And then take it to heart. Trying to maintain or roundtrip a large manual in two DIFFERENT formats is virtually impossible and a waste of time. If the manual's being in Word is just for the convenience of the reviewers/editors/SMEs, then they should learn to use Acrobat for reviewing. If it boils down to using one or the other, I would vote on Frame, even though you can probably do it in Word also. I just prefer Frame to Word for large manuals. Good luck, Van
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<59b61c26.10@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.arglkargh.de!news.buerger.net!news4us.nl!webcrossingReferences:
<59b61c26.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fd315,3eab086ff53e312b X-Google-Attributes: gidfd315,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: Van_Kurtz@adobeforums.com Newsgroups: adobe.framemaker Subject: Re: Converting to word Message-ID: <59b61c26.10@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:20:52 -0700 References: <59b61c26.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Lines: 15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.arglkargh.de!news.buerger.net!news4us.nl!webcrossing