Re: What is Framemaker really for?

Article View: adobe.framemaker

Article #641

#641

From: Sheila_Carlisle
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:48

3 lines
798 bytes

Welcome to FM land, JM.

As far as I remember there would be very few differences in essential capabilities between 5.0 and 5.1 -- it's good to be using 5.1 as I believe it had quite a few fixes after 5.0.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <59b7e7b4.4@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing

References: <59b7e7b4.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: fd315,2fef794087e868f8
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd315,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: Sheila_Carlisle@adobeforums.com
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing
Newsgroups: adobe.framemaker
Subject: Re: What is Framemaker really for?
Message-ID: <59b7e7b4.4@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:48:54 -0800
References: <59b7e7b4.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message