Re: GET DYNAMIC CONTENT BACK!

Article View: adobe.golive.dynamic.content

Article #16

Back to adobe.golive.dynamic.content Previous Next

#16

From: Jim_Tom_Polk
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 22:44

5 lines
1333 bytes

@J.E.B. - yep, Macromedia seems to have a mind lock with people who love to code to design, while GoLive is more about bringing designs to code.

After using emacs from 1996, after I got the magic of Golive 6.0's workflow, I stopped using it. Easier to do a few clicks to do a list in Layout than twiddle with coding in Source to do the same thing.

I'm running both dW MX 2004 AND GoLive CS, and other than the lack of Dynamic Content, I like Golive CS better. Maybe if all my sites were major sites where the amount of coding was really high I might consider dW superior, but I mainly do small company and organizations, whose needs are modest.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2cd0cd2f.36@webx.la2eafNXanI>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!feed.news.schlund.de!schlund.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!webx

References: <2cd0cd2f.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11ffd2,f758cfbfc547dfbd
X-Google-Attributes: gid11ffd2,public
From: Jim_Tom_Polk@adobeforums.com
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!feed.news.schlund.de!schlund.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!webx
Newsgroups: adobe.golive.dynamic.content
Subject: Re: GET DYNAMIC CONTENT BACK!
Message-ID: <2cd0cd2f.36@webx.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 15:44:19 -0700
References: <2cd0cd2f.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 13
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message