Article View: adobe.golive.dynamic.content
Article #94Re: GET DYNAMIC CONTENT BACK!
From: Chuck_Vigeant
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 03:16
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 03:16
9 lines
1422 bytes
1422 bytes
I really don't get it. How many sites today rely on static content? 80% of our work involves dynamic content - using a variety of database architecture. One of our selling points for clients, is that they don't have to have us make changes to interface at costly rates. All they have to do is update their database. I was absolutely floored at the lack of support here. I am at a loss as to what to do, or where to go. My choices are Front Page (unthinkable) and DreamWeaver ( I have no clue); or handcoding (which I used to do). For know I will have to uninstall CS and as someone else said: let it collect dust on the shelf. Dr. Phil said it best: "what in the hell were you thinking?"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2cd0cd2f.44@webx.la2eafNXanI>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!proxad.net!216.196.110.149.MISMATCH!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!feed.news.schlund.de!schlund.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!webxReferences:
<2cd0cd2f.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 11ffd2,f758cfbfc547dfbd X-Google-Attributes: gid11ffd2,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: Chuck_Vigeant@adobeforums.com Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!proxad.net!216.196.110.149.MISMATCH!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!feed.news.schlund.de!schlund.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!webx Newsgroups: adobe.golive.dynamic.content Subject: Re: GET DYNAMIC CONTENT BACK! Message-ID: <2cd0cd2f.44@webx.la2eafNXanI> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 20:16:07 -0700 References: <2cd0cd2f.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI> Lines: 16 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit