🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: adobe.indesign.featurerequests
Article #1783

Re: Better drop shadow controls

#1783
From: Robert_Schwalbe
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 19:46
25 lines
1462 bytes

      No offense, but this stuff should be native, and we shouldn't have to
      worry about sending things off to the printer without external viewers.




No offense taken. The external viewer is a trade-off that as
software developers we had to make. If we could have avoided
the viewer, we certainly would have. Maybe one day all of these
effects will be native, maybe not. Still have no disagreement with
your position whatsoever.

      I'm curious, though, if exporting PDF from a file with your plug-in enabled
      has any special problems not normally encountered with files that don't
      use 3rd party plug-ins.




None that we know of. Any "InEffects" will end up getting flattened
just like one of InDesign'sdrop shadows, so by the time you have
a PDF file you are completly severed from the need of any viewer
(minus Adobe Acrobat).
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3bbb5158.11@webx.la2eafNXanI>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!quokka.wn.com.au!webx
References: <3bbb5158.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 1efe7f,590907aa21eeee7c
X-Google-Attributes: gid1efe7f,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: Robert_Schwalbe@adobeforums.com
Newsgroups: adobe.indesign.featurerequests
Subject: Re: Better drop shadow controls
Message-ID: <3bbb5158.11@webx.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 12:46:21 -0700
References: <3bbb5158.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 18
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!quokka.wn.com.au!webx