Re: Page Maker VS Indesign

Article View: adobe.pagemaker.windows

Article #2

Back to adobe.pagemaker.windows Previous Next

From: John_Davies
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:33

7 lines
860 bytes

A large and incomplete list is here:
* John Davies, "Moving on to InDesign" #1, 24 Jan 2006 3:03 pm </webx?14@@.3bbe32cb/0>

Opentype fonts, inbuilt table editor, and reliable PDF creation are three very good reasons. It's just so much better.

Iechyd da! John
08:33 17/01/2009 GMT

Technical Details

Message-ID: <59b7892b.2@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing

References: <59b7892b.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 114d5a,f03b8865b67dd186
X-Google-Attributes: gid114d5a,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: John_Davies@adobeforums.com
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing
Newsgroups: adobe.pagemaker.windows
Subject: Re: Page Maker VS Indesign
Message-ID: <59b7892b.2@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:33:59 -0800
References: <59b7892b.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 9
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message