does pm7 mean adobe is *not* going to phase out pm, one of the reasons i switched to indesign? - Article 35748 - go-pugleaf

Article View: adobe.pagemaker.windows

Article #35748

Back to adobe.pagemaker.windows Previous Next

does pm7 mean adobe is not going to phase out pm, one of the reasons i switched to indesign?

#35748

From: Geralyne Rudolph
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 22:17

1 lines
988 bytes

was about to recommend a legacy pm doc be converted to indesign to avoid update hassles down the road, because i'd heard that adobe was not going to continue to upgrade pagemaker 6.5. now i see a 7.0. what's the scoop?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <ef88810.-1@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!iad-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebX

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 114d5a,4258a173fb3c18d8,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid114d5a,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-14 15:37:38 PST
From: "Geralyne Rudolph" <grudolph@ch2m.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!iad-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!WebX
Newsgroups: adobe.pagemaker.windows
Subject: does pm7 mean adobe is *not* going to phase out pm, one of the reasons i switched to indesign?
Message-ID: <ef88810.-1@WebX.aaQKaf7vad4>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 15:17:04 -0700
Lines: 4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit