Article View: adobe.photography
Article #1502Re: DXO plug in
From: Donald_Reese
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:05
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:05
1 lines
1155 bytes
1155 bytes
After seeing the last acr improvements, i do not doubt your suggestion, and will do some more research to get more opinions before i go either way. For me i have never seen sharpening affect my files quite the same way i see dxo doing it. i was under the impression that dxo was not necessarily sharpening the file, but fixing inherent lens flaws using their ca correction and lens softness correction modules. their example photo on lens softness is exactly what i see being corrected on many of my lenses. i need to make some prints with and without to see if it translates to real improvements.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<59b7e0c5.26@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossingReferences:
<59b7e0c5.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 1effa1,2dc50dc4ad199adb X-Google-Attributes: gid1effa1,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: Donald_Reese@adobeforums.com Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing Newsgroups: adobe.photography Subject: Re: DXO plug in Message-ID: <59b7e0c5.26@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:05:10 -0800 References: <59b7e0c5.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Lines: 9 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit