🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: adobe.photography
Article #1502

Re: DXO plug in

#1502
From: Donald_Reese
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:05
1 lines
1155 bytes
After seeing the last acr improvements, i do not doubt your suggestion, and will do some more research to get more opinions before i go either way. For me i have never seen sharpening affect my files quite the same way i see dxo doing it. i was under the impression that dxo was not necessarily sharpening the file, but fixing inherent lens flaws using their ca correction and lens softness correction modules. their example photo on lens softness is exactly what i see being corrected on many of my lenses. i need to make some prints with and without to see if it translates to real improvements.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <59b7e0c5.26@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing
References: <59b7e0c5.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 1effa1,2dc50dc4ad199adb
X-Google-Attributes: gid1effa1,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: Donald_Reese@adobeforums.com
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing
Newsgroups: adobe.photography
Subject: Re: DXO plug in
Message-ID: <59b7e0c5.26@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:05:10 -0800
References: <59b7e0c5.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 9
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit