Re: Help!

Article View: adobe.photography

Article #1672

#1672

From: Hopper
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:51

9 lines
1141 bytes

There is a conventional wisdom that suggests that a memory card and reader are far less costly to replace, (in the case of a goofy electrical spike/surge/dip while transferring your files), than a camera is. If one were to be using the camera when such an anomaly occured, one might be in the market for a new camera!

Besides transferring from your camera uses your camera battery. Why reduce the charge of the battery for something that can very easily be done with a memory card reader?

and then there is what Q said! ;)

Just my $0.02 worth! :)

Hopper

Technical Details

Message-ID: <59b7c45c.4@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing

References: <59b7c45c.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 1effa1,f00700e1810a5ff0
X-Google-Attributes: gid1effa1,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: Hopper@adobeforums.com
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing
Newsgroups: adobe.photography
Subject: Re: Help!
Message-ID: <59b7c45c.4@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:51:58 -0800
References: <59b7c45c.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 15
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message