Article View: adobe.photography
Article #557Re: So is the photography forum dead or grasping for its last breath?
From: Ozpeter
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:08
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:08
20 lines
3080 bytes
3080 bytes
John Cornicello posted this on the ephemeral test site - "Might as well post the entire section... -------------------------------------- 8. Use of Your Content. a. Adobe does not claim ownership of Your Content. However, except as provided in Section 8(b), you grant Adobe a worldwide, royalty-free, nonexclusive, perpetual, irrevocable, and fully sublicensable license to use, distribute, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, publicly perform and publicly display Your Content (in whole or in part) and to incorporate Your Content into other Materials or works in any format or medium now known or later developed. And now in more common terms: We realize that this section might look a bit scary and so we want to point out a few things. This section only applies to those portions of our sites, such as User Forums, where we intend for users to share content freely with Adobe and with each other. It does not apply to all of the content that you share, contribute or post to our sites. For example, it does not apply to content hosted by Photoshop.com or Acrobat.com. For services like those, we will provide customized license grants that are consistent with the spirit and intent of those services and that are appropriate for the kinds of content we expect you to share within them. (We say this more formally below.) So we encourage you to be selective when deciding which content to contribute under this license and we want you to be sure that you are comfortable granting the above rights when it comes to that specific content. ----------------------------------- Which basically means that you give Adobe permission to display the image on the site. Without those terms we would not not be able to display (perform, distribute, reproduce, modify (resize), publish, etc.) your image on the site. I will see if they have some clarification on that part in italics that refers to Forums. Thanks!" (That's the end of what John said) I can appreciate that professional photographers are highly sensitive to this kind of issue but it does appear to be intended to (for instance) prevent someone who has posted an image here from then demanding payment from Adobe because the company have then distributed it worldwide on their site (the forum). That's why I've suggested adding words which gives them the right only to publish it in the context in which it was posted (ie the forum or its successors, eg the new Jive version).
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<59b85a13.37@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossingReferences:
<59b85a13.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 1effa1,df98f10b5350a14c X-Google-Attributes: gid1effa1,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: Ozpeter@adobeforums.com Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing Newsgroups: adobe.photography Subject: Re: So is the photography forum dead or grasping for its last breath? Message-ID: <59b85a13.37@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:08:01 -0700 References: <59b85a13.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI> Lines: 48 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit