Re: So is the photography forum dead or grasping for its last breath?

Article View: adobe.photography

Article #585

#585

From: Ozpeter
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:28

3 lines
1193 bytes

So with Ram�n saying that the terms of use aren't worth the monitor they are displayed on, and Ann saying that the problem only arises with content actually uploaded to the Adobe site, and me saying that various photographer-unfriendly-looking conditions are nothing new, we don't have to be very, very afraid, but more a bit concerned?

And to voice any concerns, whose expression might perhaps be timely as John Cornicello said he'd be raising the matter in relevant quarters, I'd agree with Ram�n that expressing them as directly as possible to Adobe would seem to be a good idea.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <59b85a13.62@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing

References: <59b85a13.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 1effa1,df98f10b5350a14c
X-Google-Attributes: gid1effa1,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
From: Ozpeter@adobeforums.com
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing
Newsgroups: adobe.photography
Subject: Re: So is the photography forum dead or
 grasping for its last breath?
Message-ID: <59b85a13.62@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 02:28:28 -0700
References: <59b85a13.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 10
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message