Re: Panorama advice sought

Article View: adobe.photography

Article #657

#657

From: Ram�n_G_Casta�eda
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:32

8 lines
834 bytes

Wade, 

      think 7 or 9. I forget.




Thanks for that info. Of course, that's not really in the vicinity of what's required for deep sky shots with a 300mm regular telephoto�as opposed to huge astronomical telescopes.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <59b7fd8d.116@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing

References: <59b7fd8d.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 1effa1,f90c1f4673be69b6
X-Google-Attributes: gid1effa1,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
From: Ram�n_G_Casta�eda@adobeforums.com
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing
Newsgroups: adobe.photography
Subject: Re: Panorama advice sought
Message-ID: <59b7fd8d.116@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:32:32 -0700
References: <59b7fd8d.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message