🚀 go-pugleaf

See the annoying watermark and never post anything over 600 pixels. High res no that would be a different image so they can't have that and I can't imagine them going to court over it.

However, if they used an image of yours that you thought was inappropriate and damaged say your professional reputation regardless of what that claus says then one could take Adobe to court. For instance altering it or up rezing it so that it did no longer expressed the quality of your work, then you would probably be entitled to damages. They say they have the right use it scale it, which does not men you have to provide them with anything other then you posted, if they failed to do so in a way that is acceptable to you, well they just painted themselves in a corner and I suggest they undo it.

there is no reason for adobe to use any image posted on the forum for any apparent reason i they intend to use such images for their promotional and advertising efforts then they would have to state so it is not now stated as such and it does not imply it as well and they were very careful not to imply it. In being so smart the lawyers screwed it up.

They actually virtually left no reason for them to use it by being so vague otherwise you are stating you really have no reason to use it.

And if they get smart you can drag them into small claims court or do it in the state court as a pro se. They are not going to spend three grand to defend something that might cost them half that for a royalty and if they started using the images like that regularly then everyone should simply drag them into court. That would proabbly make them either kill the forum or remove the claus which is faulty anyway.