Re: Where were you? (part four)

Article View: adobe.photography

Article #89

#89

From: LRK
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:50

1 lines
704 bytes

Actually I think using the 100-400 or even the 70-200 will help with better shallow DOF. Just more frames to stitch.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3bc357b6.2471@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing

References: <3bc357b6.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 1effa1,863fff5ab7a4f82f,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid1effa1,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: LRK@adobeforums.com
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing
Newsgroups: adobe.photography
Subject: Re: Where were you? (part four)
Message-ID: <3bc357b6.2471@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 13:50:43 -0700
References: <3bc357b6.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message