Canon better for Raw?

Article View: adobe.photoshop.camera.raw.plugin.windows

Article #112

Back to adobe.photoshop.camera.raw.plugin.windows Previous Next

#112

From: ScottieG.
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 04:19

1 lines
801 bytes

A Canon rep said that Canon's software does a better job on RAWs... ie noise, cross hatching, except is it slower than ACR. What have others discovered? thanks.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3bb4d71f.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!proxad.net!62.253.162.219.MISMATCH!news-out.ntli.net!newsrout1.ntli.net!news-in.ntli.net!ntli.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!webx

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 16edff,49dc2ab017c78007,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid16edff,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: Scottie_G.@adobeforums.com
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!proxad.net!62.253.162.219.MISMATCH!news-out.ntli.net!newsrout1.ntli.net!news-in.ntli.net!ntli.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!webx
Newsgroups: adobe.photoshop.camera.raw.plugin.windows
Subject: Canon better for Raw?
Message-ID: <3bb4d71f.-1@webx.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:19:42 -0700
Lines: 3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit