Re: Spot Channel Overhaul

Article View: adobe.photoshop.featurerequest

Article #244

Back to adobe.photoshop.featurerequest Previous Next

#244

From: PeterK.
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:58

1 lines
1152 bytes

I agree. Adobe could implement new spot handling capabilities (which I'm sure would be a fairly difficult task), and have prepress houses everywhere pay extra for a "separations extended" version. They keep adding bells and whistles to attract the average non-user, but those that have been using Photoshop for heavy-duty, and often very difficult and time-consuming work have been ignored, to the detriment of the printing industry. How many hours and dollars could be saved if they implemented more print-friendly functions? How many more dollars could Adobe make if they did?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <59b72b81.0@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing

References: <59b72b81.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: 102281,c638aaeb7671a162
X-Google-Attributes: gid102281,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
From: PeterK.@adobeforums.com
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!webcrossing
Newsgroups: adobe.photoshop.featurerequest
Subject: Re: Spot Channel Overhaul
Message-ID: <59b72b81.0@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 08:58:03 -0800
References: <59b72b81.-1@webcrossing.la2eafNXanI>
Lines: 9
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Reply to Parent Message